In
1990,
China
was
the
world’s
11th
largest
economy
in
nominal
GDP
terms
at
$397
Billion
USD.
And
when
using
$PPP
dollars
(which
is
an
attempt
to
better
reflect
the
cost
of
living
in
a
country)
it
was
still
only
the
world’s
7th
largest
economy
at
$992
Billion.
Yet
by
2025
it
has
become
the
second
largest
to
the
United
States
in
nominal
GDP
terms
at
$20
Trillion
USD
and
the
largest
in
$PPP
terms
at
$40
Trillion.
The
maps
below
show’s
China’s
nominal
GDP
relative
to
the
10
economies
that
were
larger
than
it
was
in
nominal
GDP
terms
in
1990
(plus
Australia).
They
show
the
difference
in
size
between
them
in
1990,
the
year
they
roughly
become
equal,
and
finally
the
difference
in
size
in
2025.
Full
data
is
at
the
bottom
of
the
page.
11.
Australia
10.
Brazil
9.
Spain
8.
Iran
7.
Canada
6.
Italy
5.
UK
4.
France
3.
Germany
2.
Japan
1.
United
States
China
vs
USA
in
PPP
Dollars
Bonus
UK
vs
India
I
also
thought
it
would
be
fun
to
look
at
India
vs
the
UK.
In
1990
India’s
nominal
GDP
was
$321
Billion
($948
Billion
in
PPP)
compared
to
the
UK’s
$1.2
Trillion
nominal
($1.1
Trillion
PPP).
By
2025,
India’s
nominal
GDP
was
$4.3
Trillion
or
a
massive
$17.3
Trillion
in
PPP
terms.
This
makes
it
the
world’s
5th
largest
in
nominal
terms
and
3rd
largest
in
PPP
terms.
The
UK
in
contrast
has
a
nominal
GDP
of
$3.7
Trillion
today
or
$4.4
Trillion
in
PPP
terms.
Making
it
the
6th
largest
in
nominal
terms
and
10th
largest
in
PPP
terms.
The
data
for
all
countries
mentioned:
Country |
1990 GDP (Nominal) Millions $USD |
2025 GDP (Nominal) Millions $USD |
Nominal % Increase |
1990 GDP (PPP) Millions $ |
2025 GDP (PPP) Millions $ |
PPP Increase |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
United States |
$5,963,125 | $30,337,162 | 409% | $5,963,125 | $30,337,162 | 409% |
Japan | $3,185,904 | $4,389,326 | 38% | $2,405,271 | $6,767,661 | 181% |
Germany | $1,604,497 | $4,921,563 | 207% | $1,744,029 | $6,174,688 | 254% |
France | $1,260,874 | $3,283,429 | 160% | $1,143,554 | $4,485,437 | 292% |
United Kingdom |
$1,197,021 | $3,730,261 | 212% | $1,053,961 | $4,424,658 | 320% |
Italy | $1,164,328 | $2,459,597 | 111% | $1,242,121 | $3,691,249 | 197% |
Canada | $596,089 | $2,330,308 | 291% | $567,292 | $2,692,053 | 375% |
Iran | $581,008 | $434,243 | -25% | $312,425 | $1,782,265 | 470% |
Spain | $536,322 | $1,731,469 | 223% | $633,395 | $2,771,523 | 338% |
Brazil | $455,335 | $2,188,419 | 381% | $922,224 | $4,890,950 | 430% |
China | $396,590 | $19,534,894 | 4826% | $992,248 | $39,438,111 | 3875% |
Australia | $324,124 | $1,802,006 | 456% | $317,065 | $1,973,284 | 522% |
India | $320,979 | $4,271,922 | 1231% | $947,830 | $17,364,809 | 1732% |
Note
all
data
comes
from
the
IMF
via
Wikipedia.
Have
any
countries
grown
faster
than
China?
Since
1990
China’s
economic
growth
has
been
unprecedented
in
human
history.
It
has
lifted
more
than
800
million
people
out
of
poverty,
that’s
more
the
entire
population
of
every
country
in
Europe.
In
PPP
terms
China
grew
its
economy
3,875%.
Only
Equatorial
Guinea
(for
very
different
reasons)
outpaced
them
at
18,834%.
The
next
closest
were
Guyana
3,281%,
Cambodia
2,237%,
Ethiopia
2070%,
Qatar
2,053%
and
Vietnam
2,003%.
However,
in
nominal
terms
there
are
a
few
more
countries
that
outpaced
China.
Here
are
all
countries
that
grew
at
least
2,000%
in
Nominal
terms
between
1990
and
2025.
-
Armenia
(from
1992):
$108
Million
→
$27
Billion
–
24,509% -
Croatia
(from
1992):
$568
Million
→
$96
Billion
–
16,806% -
Kazakhstan
(from
1992):
$2.9
Billion
→
$307
Billion
–
10,565% -
Equatorial
Guinea:
$133
million
→
$13
Billion
–
9,613% -
Azerbaijan
(from
1992)
$1.2
Billion
→
$77
Billion
–
6,358% -
Vietnam:
$8.2
Billion
→
506
Billion
–
6,063% -
Cambodia:
$898
million
→
$51
Billion
–
5,597% -
Turkmenistan
(from
1992):
$1.6
Billion
→
$91
Billion
–
5,511% -
China:
$397
Billion
→
$19.5
Trillion
–
4,826% -
Tajikistan
(from
1992):
$291
Million
→
$14
Billion
–
4,767% -
Georgia
(from
1994):
$850
million
→
$36
Billion
–
4,124% -
Nicaragua:
$519
Million
→
$21
Billion
–
3,938% -
Qatar:
$6.3
Billion
→
$226
Billion
–
3,510% -
Guyana:
$685
Million
→
$24
Billion
–
3,474% -
Maldives:
$231
Million
→
$7.6
Billion
–
3,208% -
Russia
(from
1992):
$71.6
Billion
→
$2.2
Trillion
–
2,967% -
Uzbekistan
(from
1992):
$4.5
Billion
→
$127
Billion
–
2,746% -
Latvia
(from
1992):
$1.7
Billion
→
$48.1
Billion
–
2,743% -
Estonia
(from
1993):
$1.8
Billion
→
$45
Billion
–
2,430% -
Moldova
(from
1992):
$864
million
→
$19.6
Billion
–
2,174%
Nominal
vs
PPP
GDP
Nominal
GDP
Definition:
Nominal
GDP
measures
the
total
value
of
goods
and
services
produced
by
a
country,
using
current
market
prices
and
currency
exchange
rates.
Pros:
-
Simple
&
widely
used:
Easily
comparable
at
current
market
exchange
rates. -
Timely:
Data
availability
and
ease
of
calculation
make
it
useful
for
immediate
comparisons. -
Reflects
international
economic
power:
Better
reflects
the
influence
countries
have
in
global
trade
and
finance,
as
it
uses
actual
currency
exchange
rates.
Cons:
-
Price
level
differences
ignored:
Doesn’t
account
for
differences
in
cost
of
living
or
inflation
across
countries. -
Exchange
rate
volatility:
Sensitive
to
fluctuations
in
currency
values,
making
comparisons
unstable
over
time.
Purchasing
Power
Parity
(PPP)
GDP
Definition:
PPP
GDP
adjusts
for
price
differences
between
countries,
allowing
GDP
to
reflect
actual
purchasing
power
within
each
economy.
Pros:
-
More
accurate
standard
of
living
comparisons:
Reflects
actual
living
standards
and
purchasing
power
within
countries. -
Stable
comparisons
over
time:
Not
directly
influenced
by
short-term
currency
fluctuations.
Cons:
-
Less
intuitive:
Calculations
involve
assumptions
and
estimation,
making
it
harder
to
interpret
quickly. -
Data
limitations:
Quality,
availability,
and
comparability
of
data
can
be
problematic,
making
precise
estimates
challenging. -
Ignores
global
market
power:
Doesn’t
reflect
a
country’s
actual
economic
clout
on
international
markets.
Credit
for
flag
maps:
Which
one
surprised
you
the
most?
Go to Source
Author: Brilliant Maps