March 14, 2025

How Sydney CBD Became a Capital of Luxury Urbanity | Newgeography.com

Sydney-CBD.png

With
a
great
deal
of
success,
urban
development
elites
have
been
able
to
sustain
the
illusion
that
Central
Business
Districts
or
downtowns
are
still
the
functional
metropolitan
centres
they
were
five
decades
ago.
In

The
New
City’s

new
feature
report,


Rise
of
Luxury
Urbanity
as
a
System:
Sydney
CBD
,
we
set
out
to
explain
how
the
truth
is
different.
Opinion
leaders
seem
content
for
people
to
assume
CBDs
have
changed
in
only
cosmetic
ways,
essentially
the
same
but
with
taller
skylines.
But
since
at
least
the
1980s,
they
have
drifted
far
from
the
standard
functional
definition
proposed
by
geographer
Raymond
Murphy
in
1971:
a
region
“draw[ing]
its
business
from
the
whole
urban
area
and
from
all

classes
of
people.”

The
mid-twentieth
century
was
a
time
of
tensions
between
booming
suburban
peripheries,
driven
by
mass
motorisation,
and
stagnating
post-industrial
inner-cities.
After
the
1980s,
however,
these
former
industrial-mercantile
junctions
or
‘classic’
CBDs
were
fitted
up
as
global
high-amenity
enclaves.
Some
call
this
a
“shift
from
the
city
as
a
site
of
production
to
one
of
consumption.”
Over
recent
decades
Sydney
CBD
has
evolved
in
a
more
exclusive
and
upscale
direction,
hosting
around
a
tenth
of
metropolitan
jobs
compared
to
nearly
half
in
the
1950s.
The
pandemic
forced
some
belated
acknowledgement
of
this
reality
but
notions
of
natural
centrality
persist.

In
today’s
post-material
economy,
the
CBD’s
status
comes
from
a
disproportionate
share
of
public
infrastructure
rather
than
any
inherent
productivity
advantage.
Where
the
spatial
order
of
the
old
industrial-mercantile
CBD
was
arranged
around
functions,
the
contemporary
‘centre’
is
laid
out
for
amenities.
Called
‘luxurification’
by
some
scholars,
the
new
urban
logic
takes
form
as
an
upward
spiral
of
amenity
enhancements
feeding
off
surging
land
values,
gentrification
and
‘sustainable
urbanism’.
Scaled
up
amenities
make
premium
grade
development
more
feasible
as
they
amplify
the
capital
that
developers
can
substitute
for
land
on
high-priced
sites.
Luxurification
is
thus
sweeping
through
most
features
of
the
CBD
landscape,
including
all
types
of
building
stock
and
the
streetscapes
in
between.

Using
concepts
proposed
by
urban
geographers,
at
least
five
internal
trends
have
been
converging
to
make
Sydney’s
‘post-CBD’:

  1. Breakdown
    of
    the
    unipolar
    ‘core-frame’
    structure
    made
    up
    of
    service
    and
    industrial
    functions
    arranged
    in
    concentric
    rings,
    and
    rise
    of
    multipolar
    high-amenity
    precincts,
    each
    resembling
    a
    walkable
    resort-style
    campus.
  2. Spread
    of
    the
    upmarket
    ‘primary
    retail
    core’
    as
    a
    general
    feature
    beyond
    the
    ‘Peak
    Land
    Value
    Intersection’
    into
    other
    functional
    zones.
  3. Decline
    of
    the
    downmarket
    ‘secondary
    retail
    zone’
    in
    conjunction
    with
    gradual
    restrictions
    on
    motor
    vehicle
    access
    and
    confinement
    of
    entry
    to
    passenger
    rail
    corridors
    and
    bicycle
    paths.
  4. Reshuffling
    of
    workspace
    across
    emerging
    precincts,
    inside
    and
    outside
    the
    traditional
    office
    core,
    offering
    amenities
    like
    harbour
    views,
    landscaped
    foreshores,
    green-rated
    buildings
    and
    revamped
    streetscapes
    around
    transit-hubs.
  5. Penetration
    of
    residential
    development
    into
    the
    CBD,
    even
    the
    former
    retail
    and
    office
    cores,
    from
    the
    peripheral
    ‘zone
    of
    transition’.


The
classic
CBD
was
functionally
and
socio-economically
diverse

In
the
wake
of
advancing
post-war
suburbanisation,
there
was
a
surge
of
interest
in
the
CBD
amongst
American
geographers
during
the
1950s.
Based
on
their
field
work
in
nine
mid-sized
US
cities,
researchers
Raymond
Murphy
and
James
Vance
conceived
the
Land
Value
Method
of
delimiting
outer
CBD
boundaries.
They
pinpointed
the
district’s
Peak
Land
Value
Intersection
(PLVI)
and
traced
the
values
of
lots
or
blocks
spreading
outwards
in
concentric
circles
until
values
declined
to
five
percent
of
PLVI
value.
In
most
cases
the
PLVI
was
“located
within
a
few
hundred
feet
of
the
[district’s]
geographic
center”,
and
from
there
“land
values
decrease
rapidly
at
first
as
one
leaves
the
peak
intersection.”
A
city’s
“maximum
pedestrian
concentration
and

greatest
vehicular
congestion”
were
typically
found
at
the
PLVI.

Read
the
rest
of
this
piece
at

The
New
City
Journal
.


John
Muscat
is
a
co-editor
of

The
New
City
Journal
.

Go to Source
Author: John Muscat